Blog Layout

Collaborative completions
Matt Hunter • Mar 01, 2019

Dale Logan, C&J Energy Services and Panos Adamopoulos, Seismos, USA, examine a combination of new technologies designed to optimize horizontal completions.

The process of optimizing a horizontal completion is typically a series of T trial-and-error adjustments designed to improve well productivity. As changes to the treatment schedule and/or perforation scheme are implemented, the effectiveness is judged by comparing the production of the new well to the production of offset wells. However, most operators agree that this optimization process could benefit significantly from additional feedback. For instance, when there is an observed difference in production between the new well and neighboring wells, is it caused by variations at every stage - or is it just a few stages that are underperforming or overperforming? It would also be valuable to be able to differentiate between productivity variations that result from changes in the completion design versus changes due to heterogeneity in the geological facies along the lateral. 


There are several commercial technologies in the market that attempt to address 

these questions. A few examples include hydraulic frac monitoring using microseismic, production logging and tracer logs. While these techniques have been used successfully in some instances, none have proven valuable enough to be universally accepted. The biggest challenge is that they are difficult to deploy and require a lot of planning on the part of the operator. And, because difficult deployment translates to increased expenses, most operators are willing to consider using these technologies only if they are foolproof, easy to use and provide complete diagnostic insight. Unfortunately, this is not the case with any of them, so they are relegated to exist as niche players within the shale industry.

Simple deployment delivers sophisticated data

The new Seismos-Frac™ service targets this shortcoming with a simple, noninvasive method that delivers a direct, comprehensive measurement of fracture-network properties. Seismos' approach uses a combination of ambient noise and induced, tube-wave pressure pulses to investigate the hydraulic fracture network. The measurements delivered include frac geometry (width, height and half-length), as well as near-and far-field characterizations of fracture network complexity, fracture conductivity and proppant placement. These results are produced on a stage-by-stage basis in near-real time, normally within 10 minutes of the completion of pumping. This enables the operator to review the measurements, assess the performance of a given stage and then use any learnings on successive stages. 


The service is relatively affordable because it uses a straightforward installation process that is virtually plug and play. A pair of pressure transducers is installed at surface, which can typically be done in less than an hour. During the completion process, ambient noise is analyzed, and pressure pulses are sent down the fluid column to investigate the perf clusters - both before and after fracturing operations. This can be done without any interruption to the on-location completions team. As a result, this technology is particularly well suited to the industrialized environment of today's shale industry.

Collaboration is key

Seismos-Frac technology has been available in the field since 2017 and has been deployed on roughly ll0 wells to date. Early evaluations show that variability in frac geometry and conductivity from stage to stage is not only common, it is often the norm. The two most frequent causes for these variations are changes in the treatment schedule and changes in the rock properties along the horizontal well bore. To isolate the two sources of variability, Seismos encourages operators to use the Seismos-Frac service alongside C&J Energy Services' Lateral Science method. This method uses existing drilling data to evaluate changes in rock mechanics along the lateral. As with the Seismos-Frac service, the LateralScience method is delivered in an affordable, noninvasive manner, which makes the tandem technologies a natural fit into any completion workflow.

Quantitative data tells the story

In a recent well, this collaborative approach was put to the test. In part one of the test, a group of seven stages was completed using 57% less proppant and 38% less slurry than a comparable group of stages with similar rock properties (as indicated by the LateralScience facies). For the subject test group, the Seismos-Frac geometric results indicated 35% less half-length, exactly the same height and slightly higher frac width. Qualitatively, these results make perfect sense - and, since the goal was to achieve a shorter half-length (to avoid frac hits), the operator was pleased. 


In part two of the test, a group of 16 stages drilled in lower-strength rock was compared to a group of eight stages drilled in higher-strength rock. The treatment schedule and completion design were held constant between the two groups. In this scenario, the lower-strength rock delivered half-lengths that were 24% longer, accompanied by far-field fracture conductivity that was 30% lower than in the higher-strength rock. Once again, this result is consistent with a lower-strength interval creating more planar fractures that extend farther from the wellbore, which distributes the proppant across a larger area and therefore produces a lower average conductivity index. Qualitatively, this is consistent with Nolte plot interpretations made on previous wells, and a quantitative value can now be assigned to the impact observed.

Better information delivers better value

The value of Seismos-Frac measurements is obvious to experts in the completion engineering domain, and this value goes well beyond optimizing the completion design. The principle applications that operators have identified as most valuable include the following:

Well-to-well optimization

New field development 

This application can be extremely valuable when an operator is moving into a new area and trying to determine what works and what does not. It can provide clarity on what the fracture system looks like and what well spacing might be most appropriate. It can also provide insight into understanding correlations between stimulation designs, geology and fracture-network properties.


Sensitivity studies 

Seismos-Frac measurements can also quantify how sensitive the completion is to any changes implemented in the treatment schedule. It is not unusual for operators to experiment with changes in slurry volumes, pump rates, prop pant concentrations, chemical additives, etc. Real time, quantitative feedback on how these changes impact fracture geometry and fracture-network properties affords the operator greater insight to help decide whether to adopt a new completion approach. In addition to the real time value brought by sensitivity studies on a stage-by-stage basis, they are also useful after the fact to plan for the next well.

Stage-to-stage optimization (real time)

Completion optimization 

When operating in well-understood areas, the value of these measurements is realized in real time, stage-by-stage completion optimization. The original treatment schedule assumes an anticipated geometry and set of fracture-network properties. The metrics that most completion engineers use to gauge fracturing performance are pounds of prop pant per lateral foot or barrels of treatment fluid per lateral foot. When wells perform outside of expectations, they presume it is related to these metrics or that it is due to poorly distributed proppant. By monitoring each stage, compliance can be assessed, and the treatment adjusted as needed. When adjustments are required, the monitoring also provides measurements to quantify the impact of each treatment change to the resulting fracture system.


Zipper fracs 

When it is time to develop the field, most operators move to pad drilling and zipper fracs. The tighter well spacing introduces issues like potential interference between wells and even frac hits. In this case, understanding the frac height and half-length is critical to ensure compliance. This allows the operator to approach the completion aggressively while avoiding excessive frac length that could be detrimental to production. 


Operational assurance 

In some scenarios, the focus will be on operational efficiency. By monitoring treatments on the fly, an operator can detect issues - such as leaking plugs, hydraulic communication with previous stages or even screenouts - as they develop. Providing an additional tool to detect these events enables the operator to do a better job of reacting to them and ultimately in adjusting the approach to avoid them.

Delivering results 

As discussed above, this service has the potential to change how the completion workflow is performed in the field. However, to transform this potential into tangible value, the plans put together at the head office must be well aligned with what is actually happening in the field. Experience has shown that there can be significant 'value leakage' at the field level if this is not properly addressed. This is the primary driver in the alliance formed between Seismos and C&J Energy Services. 


Seismos believes value leakage can be minimized by aligning its Seismos-Frac offering with a service provider that is fully vested in the success of the service. It starts at the front lines, where C&J's frac engineers are trained to understand both LateralScience and Seismos-Frac technologies - as well as how the two complement each other. On-site engineers are fully briefed on both the overarching objectives of the survey and the expected results. It is very important that the person in charge of executing the job understands completely how each specific action will impact the success of the survey. While communication with the head office is important, communication between the frac van and the Seismos trailer is vital. When this is done seamlessly, the odds of success increase significantly.

Setting the stage for the next generation 

As with any groundbreaking technology, growth and adoption follow a distinct life cycle ¬¬¬–– and these are still the very early days of the Seismos-Frac offering. While the service is being embraced by the industry, it is still in the evaluation phase as operators continue to test it and become comfortable with the results they are getting. Equipment and people are being added as quickly as practical to meet the demand. Pioneering technologies will enable the next generation of engineers to make better-informed decisions and ultimately deliver more oil and gas with ever-greater efficiency. The Seismos-Frac and LateralScience collaboration provides a preview of what that will look like.

By Mason Nasizadeh 17 Jul, 2023
Seismos and FastPack Partner to Monitor Chile's Mining Pipeline Assets
By Mason Nasizadeh 18 Nov, 2022
Europe is strategically targeting its energy independence by leveraging a fast-track pursuit of clean energy solutions while securing safer access to traditional forms of energy generation. On Monday Oct 31 2022, the Research and Technology Committee of the Greek Parliament conducted a meeting on the theme of Accelerating Clean Tech Innovation and Startup Entrepreneurship in the energy space. Christos Tarantilis, Chairperson, and member of Parliament voiced that Clean-Tech startups can do more than ever to help solve Europe’s energy challenges. Such challenges would include the safe and reliable storage of renewable energy, the effective usage and management of smart energy grids and super grids, cuts in carbon dioxide emissions, the optimization of energy efficiency throughout the entire chain – from production to transportation, to distribution and to final consumption.
By Mason Nasizadeh 04 May, 2022
AUSTIN - SEISMOS INC, leader in advanced acoustic sensing and non-invasive monitoring systems, announced today a partnership with Liberty Energy to expand the toolset for real-time quality control of stimulation performance. Liberty and Seismos will focus on maximizing value to E&P operators by offering the Seismos-MWF™ (Measurements While Fracturing) QC and analytics system alongside Liberty’s completion services. Through a simple surface connection, without a need for downhole equipment or offset well instrumentation, the Seismos-MWF™ system uses active controlled acoustics to directly probe the near-wellbore fracture network, providing a Near Field Connectivity Index (NFCI) for each stage. The connectivity between the fracture system and the wellbore can be an important contributor to productivity at both the well and stage level thus providing information on the quality of the fracture stimulation. The extended data collection of the Seismos-MWF™ system after each stage also allows for better fracture model calibration with pressure decline data. This QC metric is used to benchmark in real-time every stimulated stage & well against the best producing wells of a similar geological and reservoir profile. The NFCI targets, ‘trained’ by a database of 15,000+ stage measurements and production repository, are fine-tuned for the localized acreage and continuously re-calibrated as new production data becomes available, helping Liberty customers optimize fracture designs, make changes while completing the well and improve well performance. ”We are excited to offer the Seismos-MWF™ system, a completions quality control tool that complements our industry leading portfolio of fracture optimization technologies,” said Dr. Mike Mayerhofer, Director of Technology at Liberty. “The Seismos-MWF™ system can provide a cost-effective measurement of stimulation quality in each stage and well. If NFCI falls well below target while completing the well, design or perforation changes can be made to improve NFCI on the subsequent stages.” Panos Adamopoulos, CEO of Seismos stated, “Every stage counts. The biggest limitation to real-time fracture optimization was the lack of practical, cost-effective technologies that can be applied in every well as mainstream practice. We are thrilled to partner with Liberty, a team of experts setting the standards for engineering and customer delivery in our industry.” About Seismos Inc. SEISMOS INC, based in Austin, TX, USA is a pioneer in AI-powered acoustic sensing systems enabling real-time, non-intrusive, cost-effective QC and monitoring. The company, backed by Quantum Energy Partners and Javelin Venture Partners, operates in the US, Canada, and China. Contact info: info@seismos.com About Liberty Energy Liberty (NYSE: LBRT) is a leading North American energy services firm that offers one of the most innovative suites of completion services and technologies to onshore oil and natural gas exploration and production companies. Liberty was founded in 2011 with a relentless focus on developing and delivering next generation technology for the sustainable development of unconventional energy resources in partnership with our customers. Liberty is headquartered in Denver, Colorado. For more information about Liberty, please contact Investor Relations at IR@libertyfrac.com.
By Mason Nasizadeh 24 Jan, 2022
As diverter technology becomes more relevant in wellbore stimulation, DiverterPlus and Seismos have teamed up to advance technologies in the near-field. In the recent SPE Live Tech Talk “The Near-field Drives Production,” representatives from the two companies shared how their partnership and technology help promote near-field stimulation.
By Mason Nasizadeh 18 Nov, 2020
Seismos kicks-off MWF™ (Measurements While Fracing) operations in China. MWF™ is the only system capable of detecting and correcting understimulation in real-time and is now available to the Chinese market. Contact info@seismos.com for any related inquiries.
By Mason Nasizadeh 03 Dec, 2019
In an interview with Oilfield Network News, Seismos Founder and CEO Panos Adamopoulos discusses Seismos products and how clients are using Seismos to leverage real-time decisions at the field level. Follow the Oilfield Network News to receive the latest update about oilfield businesses, innovative technologies, and remarkable people. https://www.linkedin.com/company/oilfieldnetworknews/
By Matt Hunter 07 May, 2019
This case study appeared in the July 2018 edition of E&P Magazine
By Matt Hunter 10 Apr, 2019
This case study appeared in the September 2018 edition of E&P Magazine
Share by: